“Russian Conditioning.”

A friend posted a live video on wrestling conditioning that took me back to my high school coach, David Kling.  Coach Kling was the head wrestling coach at Keystone Oaks High School (Pittsburgh, PA) from 1973 to 2003 and retired as the fourth-winningest coach in WPIAL history, compiling a record of 381-152-2.  Sadly, Coach passed away in December 2012.

Our high school practices were highly structured.  Coach Kling even published an article in 1983 in Athletic Journal about these workouts.  (I came across the article quite by accident when working on a paper for my Master’s degree in 1985.)  There was a reason we were one of the best conditioned wrestling teams in the WPIAL at the time.

One of the components of the practice was the “Russian Conditioning Program”.  This was about 15 minutes of what today might be labeled as “HIIT”.  We did all crazy combinations of push-ups, hand-walks, squats, lunges, and other movements using sandbags.  It is perhaps this conditioning that ultimately turned me on to the Bulgarian bag.  It was certainly effective.

This was not the only conditioning we did.  We also ran a lot of steps in the school, did “partner carries” down the hallway near the gym, lifted weights, and, among other creative conditioning drills, ran the pool deck (my personal favorite—think: steps meet track meet sauna!).  We worked our tails off.

These memories prompted me to Google “Russian conditioning” and I came across the following:

Apparently, CrossFit and HIIT aren’t as new as your trainer will tell you.

I am inspired watching this and remembering back to those workouts where my t-shirt would be drenched and losing 9-lb of water between 3 and 5 PM was a regular occurrence.  I am appreciating the evenings when my son comes home from wrestling practice with a story about how Coach Keeney worked him.  I am inspired to ramp up my Bulgarian bag training!

Be your best today; be better tomorrow!

Carpe momento!

 

Stroboscopic Training.

I was introduced to stroboscopic training just before I took the leap and opened our sports performance training center in 2012.  Nike was rolling out its Vapor Strobes—really cool sensory training glasses designed by Dr. Alan Reichow and his team at Pacific University and Nike Sports Sensory Training.  Sadly, Nike shut down the SST division just as we were opening, but not before I purchased a dozen units to use with our athletes.

This week, I had lunch with my friend, Tony, who was with Nike SST on the Vapor Strobe project and is now with Vima.  Vima is nearing the launch of the Rev Sport and Rev Tactical (www.vima.com).  These promise to be even more exciting than the original Strobes, which are available with some minor upgrades through Senaptec (www.senaptec.com).

I rarely sing the praises of any fitness trend or product, so, when I do, one can be sure that I am a believer and the science backs it up.  I see tremendous benefit in stroboscopic training across multiple populations.  We saw near immediate improvements in focus, object tracking, and movement response.  For the athlete, it was always a fun finish to an intense training session to do any of the numerous drills we developed.

Tony once summarized the goal of the Strobes to me as “ESP” (i.e., extra-sensory perception).  In other words, to remove vision almost entirely from the sports activity and allow the other senses to take over.  Now, of course, the strobes won’t turn someone into Matt Murdock (i.e., “Daredevil”), but….

Think of stroboscopic training as learning to watch a movie with fewer and fewer frames.  The brain learns to infer the missing information.  This, in turn, allows the brain to process other potentially relevant information.  Think of the benefits for, say, a football wide-receiver.  If the receiver doesn’t have to watch the ball all the way into the hands, the brain is free to see more of the field—other players, the sidelines, the goal line, etc.  Following a session with the strobes, an athlete often perceives the ball as bigger and/or slower—easier to follow.

Athletes benefit, but I have long seen the benefits for older adults (e.g., developing balance, peripheral vision, etc.) and tactical athletes, such as Special Forces, police, etc.  Imaging how much more effective those who are charged with our safety can be, if they can more quickly process information and make the appropriate decision.

I am excited to see stroboscopic glasses coming back on the market.  They are a valuable tool for coaches, trainers, physical therapists, and anyone seeking to improve sensory performance.  I’ve continued to use my personal stash.  (My son is a lacrosse goalie, and they are great for practice.)  I have many friends who have young athletes who can benefit from the training.  As well, I trust these will find their way into rehabilitation centers and begin to benefit senior adults.  These are beyond cool and trendy.  They are something that work for a great variety of people.

Check ‘em out!

Carpe momento!

Tests.

It is already coming up on test time for my students.  Personally, I don’t like giving tests.  I need something upon which to base my grades for the term, but if I can avoid using tests, I will.  It is not that I want to make my courses easy or avoid that work of writing exams and grading.  I prefer not to give tests because they don’t really accomplish what I want them to do.

I don’t want my students to do well on tests.  No, I am not on an ego trip, nor do I take pleasure in failing students.  I am simply less interested in knowing what my students know as much as what they don’t know.  Instead of using tests as an assessment tool, I want tests to be a teaching tool.  Let’s face it, as students, we look at our score first and then what we got wrong.  We rarely go back to look at the questions we got correct.  If, however, we missed a question, we want to know what is the correct answer.  It challenges us to think.  As a teacher, I am tricking the student into reviewing the material again—after the test.

Tests reveal our weaknesses.  They challenge us to grow.  Whether in school or life, we learn the most when we are forced to leave our comfort-zone.

We are often taught to avoid failure.  In school, we want an ‘A’ on the exam.  Anything less and we are underperforming.  Some teachers prefer a nice bell-curve.  Me?  I don’t care what grades my students get on the exam.  I am more concerned with whether that have mastered the material by the end of the term.  I want them to fail so that they can ultimately succeed.

In graduate school, I studied Anatomy with Dr. Dennis Morse at the (then) Medical College of Ohio.  We would spend time dissecting the cadavers through the week and study what we could from our Anatomy textbooks.  There were no study guides.  There were no lectures.  Dr. Morse would come in once a week and proceed in asking us questions.  Invariable, he would ask my peers questions to which I knew the answers.  To me, however, he would ask questions that seemed to come out of left field.  (The case was the same for my friends, as well.)  I wondered how I was getting A’s each term when I seemingly knew nothing.  Somehow, Dr. Morse seemed to know what each of us didn’t know.  Surely, he could have asked me easier questions—or at least some that I actually knew—but he knew better.  He challenged me to think about Anatomy (a course for which memorization is the typical path to success).  In the end, when I sat for my oral comprehensive exams, Dr. Morse started with questions that I knew he would ask and moved to increasingly challenging questions—questions that were outside the limits of what I had studied.  When my comprehensive exam concluded, I had not missed a single question.  Now, one could conclude that I am just brilliant—and I wish that were true—but what it demonstrated was that I had actually learned anatomy.  It was a valuable experience that I continue to carry now into my 20th year of teaching.

In all areas of life, we need to be challenged to fail.  We need to stretch beyond our comfort zone and beyond our experience.  We need to practice beyond our current abilities and allow ourselves face challenges that cause us to grow.

Life is not meant to be easy.  Life is meant to make us better people.  We are meant for growth.  Let’s remember what Nietzsche said: “That which does not kill us makes us stronger.”

Be your best today; be better tomorrow!

Carpe momento!

Gratitude check.

“Gratitude can transform common days into thanksgivings, turn routine jobs into joy, and change ordinary opportunities into blessings.”—William Arthur Ward

From time to time, we just need to stop and just be grateful.  Gratitude is fragile. If we don’t tend to it daily, it dies.  Every day is an opportunity to start fresh and leave our past, our negativity, our frustrations, our anger, our disappointment, our…, and anything that robs us of our joy and happiness behind.

Today is a short post.  I just want to stop and consider all that I get to do today.

Carpe momento!

Motivation.

We are all motivated by different things.  As a father, teacher, and somewhat of a ‘coach’, I don’t find motivating others to be easy.  You’d think I would, given that I teach a course called “Exercise Motivation & Adherence”.  Nonetheless, we try.

First and foremost, motivation has to come from within.  We can listen to the best motivational speeches, but we must choose to respond.  We need to respond to the triggers, but ultimately behavior is a choice.  Even Pavlov’s dog (ring a bell?—I couldn’t resist.)  had to first make the decision before it could be trained—conditioned—to respond automatically.

We need to be sensitive to others’ motivation.  Look for cues to tell us that our efforts are not working—and may even be counter-productive.  Often our best efforts may be having the effect of demotivating the other.  More of the same will only worsen the person’s motivation.  Motivation is a dynamic process.  We all have our ups and down.  In interacting with others, we need to be cognizant of the downs and intervene appropriately.  Withdrawal is, perhaps, one of the best indicators that our methods are ineffective.  Other signs are resistance.  Scales and Miller* identify arguing, interrupting, negating, and ignoring as such signs.  When such signs arise, it is time for a change in methods.

We need to do our best to encourage others in whatever effective means possible.  Sometimes, we just need a little help being our best today, so we can be better tomorrow.

Carpe momento!

*Scales, R. & Miller, J.H. (2003) Motivational techniques for improving compliance with an exercise program: skills for primary care clinicians. Current Sports Medicine Reports 2:166-172.

Why the “basic 5”.

I have settled over the years on five basic exercises in my weight training program.  I call these the “basic five”.  They are the squat, deadlift, bench, press, and row.  There are countless exercises and variations from which to choose, but I have settled on these for several reasons:

Time.  Frankly, I don’t have a lot of time to put toward exercise.  I have a one-hour commute to work, so I lose over two hours a day just with going to and from work.  I also have two kids and a wife.  They deserve some of my time.  I also need to sleep.  Etc.  Exercise is a priority, though.  So, I have to make the best use of my time.  Compound movements, such as the squat, deadlift, bench, press, and row, target the whole body in few exercises.  I don’t need to do 8-10 exercises in a workout to get a whole-body response.

Access.  I train at home.  I have a fairly well-equipped gym in my garage.  I have a power-rack/Smith machine combo with a high/low pulley and adjustable bench (Caribou III, Yukon Fitness, http://www.yukon-fitness.com/), two Olympic bars with 530 lbs of weight (6-45#, 4-35#, 2-25#, 4-10#, 4-5#,4-2.5#, and assortment of standard (1” diameter) bars (1 long, 1 ez-curl, and 8 dumbbells) with a sufficient number of plates to have a dumbbell weight as heavy as 160 lb (8-25#, 12-10#, 14-5#, 8-2.5#, 4-1.25#), a 17 kg Bulgarian Bag (Suples Ltd., https://suples.com/), and an assortment of other tools.  It is enough for me.  I don’t, however, have the variety of equipment one would find at a well-equipped commercial gym (e.g., leg press, cable crossover, pec dec, etc.)  These would be nice, but aren’t really necessary.  All of the basic five can be done with a single Olympic set.  Some might need to add plates, but these can be added over time as needed.  A basic bench and adjustable rack is not all that expensive (quality and durability become more important as strength improves and one is lifting “big” weights).  The Caribou III is only $800.

I am not a body-builder.  (Technically.)  I want to increase strength and muscle mass, but my goals are not as refined as a body-builder.  One who is training for physique, will, of course, need to perform a greater variety of exercises to maximize muscle volume.  The basic five will, however, promote hypertrophy and strength.  These can also be varied to some extent with no additional equipment.

Since I am less interested in physique, the basis five are enough to include overload of the biceps and triceps, as well as the abs/core.  I can add a few accessories exercises throughout the week to target these, if so desired.

I like to keep it simple.  Variety is nice, but it can also impede strength gains.  Strength comes from both hypertrophy and neuromuscular adaptations.  The notion that muscle needs to be “confused” to maximize gains is unfounded.  My workouts have to be short and effective (“opportunity costs”).  I do, on occasion, like to complicate thing with other movements—particularly unilateral movements that help with balance, etc.  Over all, simple is effective.  For the beginner, simple allows one to focus on technique and building strength, without the challenge of constantly learning new movements.

If you just want a simple, time-effective way to improve your muscle strength and muscle endurance, begin with the “basic five”.  If opportunity permits, by all means do more.  If time and opportunity are limited, these will serve you well.

Be your best today; be better tomorrow.

Carpe momento!

Uncle Lloyd.

I learned of my great uncle Lloyd’s passing on Saturday.  Since the passing of his wife, Phyllis, a couple of years ago, he has wanted nothing more than to be with her again.  They are together again.

Phyllis and Lloyd represented all the wonderful qualities I was raised to strive for.  Indeed, I could say my core values—faith, family, friends, growth, health, and impacting others—have come, in part, from their example.

Lloyd was one of the last independent dairy farmers in Pennsylvania.  I have countless memories of childhood visits to their farm just outside of Pittsburgh.

Lloyd worked hard every day of his life.  He was a man of great faith.  Though not a big man, he had one of the biggest hearts I have ever known a man to have.  He will be missed, but never forgotten.  The void left from his departure will certainly be filled by his children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and all the lives he has touch.

The passing of a loved one is always hard.  We bare the pain by focusing on the joy we shared.  My thoughts are with Bryan, Stanley, Barbara, and the family as they celebrate Lloyd and the blessing he was.

 

The Sunny Side

There’s a dark and a troubled side of life
There’s a bright and a sunny side, too
Though we meet with the darkness and strife
The sunny side we also may view

Keep on the sunny side, always on the sunny side
Keep on the sunny side of life
It will help us every day, it will brighten all the way
If we’ll keep on the sunny side of life

The storm and its fury broke today
Crushing hopes that we cherished so dear
Clouds and storm will in time pass away
The sun again will shine bright and clear

Keep on the sunny side, always on the sunny side
Keep on the sunny side of life
It will help us every day, it will brighten all the way
If we’ll keep on the sunny side of life

Let us greet with a song of hope each day
Though the moment be cloudy or fair
Let us trust in our savior always
To keep us every one in his care

Keep on the sunny side, always on the sunny side
Keep on the sunny side of life
It will help us every day, it will brighten all the way
If we’ll keep on the sunny side of life

Writer: Ada Blenkhorn

Overcoming is hard.

“It’s really not that difficult to overcome these seemingly ghastly problems. What’s hard is to decide.” — Robert Downey, Jr.

In the above quote, Robert Downey, Jr. is responding to an interview with Oprah about his life-long battle with drug addiction.  His is quite the story, and, for him, it came down to drugs or the love his life.  He chose wisely.

Hopefully, no one reading this has problems as seemingly insurmountable (and life-threatening) as drug addiction.  In our own ways, however, we all have “seemingly ghastly problems”.  We all have areas of our lives in which change is necessary—indeed, imperative.  We tend to think overcoming these is difficult—perhaps, impossible.  Robert Downey, Jr.’s point is quite clear.  “What is hard is to decide.”  Change ultimately comes from within.  We “alone” determine our fate.  It is easier to change when we are not alone—i.e., when we have the support of other—but no one can decide for us to make the change.  (It is important to remember, too, that we can’t change others.  We can support and educate them on the need to change, but the decision is made by the one who is to change.)

If we are battling with change, we must make the hard decision.  No excuses.  No delay.  Act.

Be your best today; be better tomorrow!

Carpe momento!

Image source: http://cdn.wegotthiscovered.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Robert-Downey-Jr-in-Iron-Man-2-Armor.jpg

Age is NOT a disability.

Twenty-something years ago, I was working as a personal trainer, and I received a new client named Harry.  Harry was 84-years-old and had never lifted weights in his life.  He had read about a (then) recent study from Tufts University that found that weight training decreased the reliance of a sample of nursing home patients on assistance devices like walkers and canes.  Harry decided to gift himself a personal trainer to help rid himself of his cane.

Harry showed up his first workout in Bermuda shorts, a Polo-style shirt, dark socks, and loafers—and with a cane, of course.  His gait reminded me of the Tim Conway character on the old ‘Carol Burnett Show’.  He had an extremely slow, shuffling walk.  (Something that required a bit of adjusting for a long-stride, speed walker, like myself.)

I worked with Harry for about 3 months.  We adapted exercises a bit and did a lot of hip work.  In that time, Harry’s gait improved significantly, and he merely carried his cane.

He was not the only senior adult with whom I worked in that season of life.  The range of abilities in these seniors was broad, but, whatever limitations these wonderful people had, they were (for the most part) reversible.  As well, all were capable of training much like anyone else.

There is a tendency to teach aging as a disability.  In my academic division, we are currently having curriculum discussions, and a course that is being floated is “Exercise and Aging”, which is a fine idea, perhaps, though the tendency in such courses is to emphasize the “inevitable” decline in performance that results from aging.  I am opposed to such an approach.

For the most part, the physical decline that is seen with aging is attributable to physical inactivity not some pre-programmed physiology.  It is true that there are more health issues with older adults, but, with the exception of a few (e.g., Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc.), these are classified as hypokinetic diseases.  In other words, these are attributable to a lack of physical activity, not aging, per se.  Thus, our considerations for exercise for the aging adult are no different than for the younger adult—e.g., bioenergy systems, muscle fiber physiology, cardiovascular response, overload, progression, specificity, etc.  Like any individual, we have to consider individual differences and goals.  We might need to modify exercise because of individual limitation—not age.  Otherwise, the same basic exercise prescriptions apply no matter the age.  One is limited only by experience, interests, and physical ability.  There is no reason why an 84-year-old should not squat, deadlift, bench press, shoulder press, and row—other than medical contraindications.

My recommendations for the aging exercises include (perhaps, a limited list):

Stay active.  We may see a decline in muscle mass of roughly 10% from the age of 25 years to 50 years.  Why?  Because “life” start to really happen around the age of 25 years—job, family, financial responsibilities, etc.  We retire from sports and exercise and grow increasingly sedentary.  These need not happen.  I teach my students that all they need to do is try to maintain—the result is a perceived level of fitness, as one’s peers decline over time.  It is always easier to maintain than to regain physical fitness.

Be smart.  If one has been inactive for some period of time, it is unwise—and unsafe—to think that one can just pick up where they left off.  Rebuild the foundation and progress slowly.

Train to the weaknesses.  We tend in exercise to train what shows.  Young guys, for example, are prone to focusing on bench and bicep curls.

Aging adults should (as all athletes should) prioritize hip and rotator cuff exercise before aggressively progressing the ‘basic five’ (i.e., squat, deadlift, bench, press, and rows).  Strong hips (abductors, adductors, extensors, and flexors) are essential for maintaining a strong gait and can help prevent a lot of injuries.

Build stability.  I will often start beginning exercisers on machines to build a feel for how the muscle should contract before progressing to more free-weight exercises.  I find this especially beneficial for children and older adults.  As quickly and safely as possible, though, there is benefit in progressing to free-weight movements—particularly compound and complex movements—that are more functional and require more stability.  And remember to build a solid core.

Don’t forget motor skill-related fitness.  Often, we focus primarily on the health-related components of fitness (cardiorespiratory, muscle strength, muscle endurance, flexibility, and body composition) and neglect the motor skill-related fitness (speed, power, agility, coordination, balance, and reaction time).  This is especially true with the older adult.  (Perhaps because we believe that these are only for athletes?)  I would stress that these are equally important for the aging adult.  How we approach these might be different for the older adult than the athlete, but important nonetheless.  These are not skills to neglect until they are lost.

Create the habit of exercise early.  Too many adults wait until they are significantly out of shape to return to the gym.  In some cases, this can be too late.  In most cases, it will require far more effort than had one remained moderately active.  Losing fat is harder than maintaining a healthy body composition.  Gaining muscle (particularly as one ages) is harder than maintaining muscle mass.  (Constant cycling of fat gaining and losing is also detrimental to maintaining muscle mass.)

Encourage physical activity as a young age.  Stand up for the restoration on physical education (i.e., Kennedy era P.E.) in schools.  Involve your children in multiple sports and physical activities.  The best preventive measure that a woman can do against osteoporosis is weight-bearing exercise prior to the first menses.  (I predict an increase in male osteoporosis over the coming decades because of the increasing levels of inactivity among pre- and adolescent boys.)  Obesity and poor fitness in children will only grow worse in adulthood.  If decline is inevitable (and some is—the rate of decline is mostly self-determined), it is best to begin from a higher starting point.

Aging is, indeed, terminal.  The process by which we age is up to us.  Choose to age well.  Be active.  Despite our advancing age, we can be our best today and be better (relatively speaking) tomorrow.

Carpe momento!

Another perspective.

There have been numerous discussions in the aftermath of the horrific mass shooting in Las Vegas on Sunday.  It is a terrible tragedy, and we need to act as a society to prevent another mass shooting.  My desire, however, is not to address the political ramifications (not here).

In a radio interview, this Wednesday, I listened to the response of a Texas man whose daughter was injured in the shooting.  His was a positive response, despite the obvious pain and anger he was confronting.  He made a comment about the impact that one man can have on thousands of lives.  He was, of course, referring to the tragic effects of the shooting on the lives lost and the impact on the injured, the community, and the families of those killed and injured.  It got me thinking though.

This was an act of pure evil.  Evil, however, does not beget evil.  Though the shooter affected thousands of lives quite negatively.  The community and the people affected have risen to the occasion.  I believe that good begets good.  Love always wins.

If each who is affected by this—or any tragedy—can turn it toward positively impacting others, the good that comes is magnified far more than the evil.  If the evil action of one can affect thousands, it can be expected that any good action can affect many (thousands, perhaps).  More importantly the good of one has a multiplying effect that is (hopefully) not the case of the evil act.

In response to the evil in the world, let us choose to do good to one another.  Let’s be supportive and caring. 

Carpe momento!

“We shall never know all the good that a simple smile can do.”–Mother Teresa